GPU GWTN141-10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGPU GWTN141-10  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210831
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 21:53
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 59.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 244
79% 147 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 522
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3790
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 19.6
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 0.2
9% 12.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800sh 512G SSD 512GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN09951
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 239 206 248 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 288
Write 403
Mixed 259
SusWrite 230
67% 295 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 20.7
82% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 39.3
51% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 32.5
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 15.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWTN141-10 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN141-10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback