MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201126
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 13:05
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 69.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 263
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 813
81% 659 Pts
64-Core 1065
66% 1065 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 206
Reflection 198
Parallax 187
168% 197 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 150
Splatting 132
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 143%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 162 166 173 169 178 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27% Poor
Read 90.4
Write 84.5
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 165
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 10.3
41% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 14.1
11% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27%
Great: 102%
StoreJet 500GB
197GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 406 188 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 421
Write 399
Mixed 243
SusWrite 198
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 0.2
42% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
100GB free
Firmware: CC40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 99 97 100 99 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 172
Write 167
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 97.4
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.5% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 24.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 30 28.8" 1280 720 GSM5BF8 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 8,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback