Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell XPS 8900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0XJ8C4
Memory	42.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '23 at 00:14
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	65%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 154 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 499 49% 403 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 114 Parallax 130 103% 123 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 126 Splatting 104 108% 136 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar NS100 2TB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: SN14546 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 236 291 360 351 318 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 316 Write 315 Mixed 234 SusWrite 296 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 19.5 75% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 243 186% 252 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 114%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 24GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 83.9 Write 10 Mixed 10.7 30% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905734-002.A00G Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 9905734-002.A00G Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 48GB 2667, 2133, 2667, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.4% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23.3 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 19.4 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	48	60	25"	1280 720	DELD072 DELL U2515H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2,135x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	466x
Core i5-6400Intel $66Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	173x

GPU
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	517x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	349x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	239x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	71x
L8H-256V2G-11 M.2 2280 256GBLiteonBench 75%, 1,826 samples	67x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	525x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 2x8GBMicronBench 73%, 4,057 samples	227x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	160x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16