Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive400% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 325
107% 196 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,004
100% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.1% Good
Lighting 75
Reflection 84.2
Parallax 74.8
61% 78 fps
MRender 76.9
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 65.3
58% 72 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3132 3136 3169 1749 661 656 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2,869
Write 3,248
Mixed 2,941
SusWrite 2,084
628% 2,786 MB/s
4K Read 80.1
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 109
357% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1,033
778% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 400%
Great: 442%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
318GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 1120 699 576 578 579 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,965
Write 1,408
Mixed 699
SusWrite 775
269% 1,212 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 59.3
228% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,104
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 858
701% 996 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 243%
Great: 254%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
918GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 463 459 456 458 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 487
Mixed 391
SusWrite 463
104% 459 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 52.1
182% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 256
219% 323 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 120%
Great: 117%
Lexar NS100 2TB
396GB free
Firmware: SN13132
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 447 447 444 447 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 472
Mixed 388
SusWrite 452
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 48
180% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 298
220% 287 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GTRS 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 51.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 40.4
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 40
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 44.3
90% 44.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 29.5" 1280 720 MSI3CC5 MSI MAG301RF
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $928
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback