Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170220
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 23:39
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 67.8 1-Core 113 2-Core 224 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 756 71% 592 Pts	64-Core 1,065 66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 20.9 18% 20.5 fps	MRender 24.5 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 17 17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB 44,174 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 445GB free (System drive) Firmware: P9CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 776 985 1367 1566 1585 1679 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	199% Outstanding	Read 1,697 Write 1,095 Mixed 1,052 SusWrite 1,326 289% 1,293 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 26.8 112% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 720 DQ Write 23.4 DQ Mixed 32.4 108% 258 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 394%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 121GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 105 102 106 118 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 131 Write 92.2 Mixed 74.3 SusWrite 112 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 89%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 33GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 75 76 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 122 Write 37 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 75.2 57% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 83%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 102GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 91 94 92 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 97.8 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 92.9 55% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 89%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 1,686 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 199GB free Firmware: 050B SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 114 116 116 117 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 82.7 Write 68.5 Mixed 52.6 SusWrite 114 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.5 146% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 6TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 22 22 24 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 57.7 Write 22.2 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 22.4 24% 32 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 94%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 3,390 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 14 15 12 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 51.2 Write 7.7 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 13.1 21% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 15% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 100%
WD easystore 264D 8TB 977 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 188GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 112 109 113 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 117 Write 41.6 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 110 107% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C DDR4 2x16GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.1% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 10.4 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 13.2 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	37	4	60	23.8"	1280 720	VSC7B32 VA2419 Series

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)