Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170220
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 23:16
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 66.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 219 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 730 68% 568 Pts	64-Core 1,067 66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 6.9 18% 15.7 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 6.9 7% 9.03 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB 44,174 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 440GB free (System drive) Firmware: P9CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 1019 1611 1621 1628 1629 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,801 Write 1,814 Mixed 1,723 SusWrite 1,404 380% 1,685 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 48.8 164% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 713 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 221 210% 347 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 394%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 121GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 110 98 94 101 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 130 Write 130 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 106 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 89%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 33GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 74 81 86 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 95.9 Write 83 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 79.6 59% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 83%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 102GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 93 94 91 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 82 Write 88.2 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 92 49% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 89%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 1,686 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 199GB free Firmware: 050B SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 96 95 96 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 82.7 Write 77.3 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 94.8 57% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.4 161% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 6TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 30.4 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 20 20% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 94%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 2,705 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 49.9 Write 34.5 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 17.5 41% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.6 186% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 101%
WD easystore 264D 8TB 977 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 188GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 103 106 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 97 Write 103 Mixed 94.1 SusWrite 104 137% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.8 242% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C DDR4 2x16GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.9% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.8 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	3	60	23.8"	1280 720	VSC7B32 VA2419 Series

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $852

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)