Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory	54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 18:59
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 198 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 504 45% 381 Pts	64-Core 474 29% 474 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3792) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Lighting 95 Reflection 89.5 Parallax 77.5 77% 87.3 fps	MRender 62.2 Gravity 77.4 Splatting 71.2 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 24 18 184 122 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 641 Write 229 Mixed 174 SusWrite 106 63% 287 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 5.5 40% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 289 199% 245 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 291%
Walram 512G 512GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 476GB free Firmware: V0523B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 774 987 984 901 973 1059 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,457 Write 1,044 Mixed 916 SusWrite 946 244% 1,091 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 20.9 111% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 553 DQ Mixed 283 254% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 229%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 20GB free Firmware: 03200001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 425 Write 362 Mixed 306 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 16.6 75% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 124 102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 380GB free Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 255 249 243 253 263 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.2% Above average	Read 264 Write 264 Mixed 223 SusWrite 248 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 15.9 74% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 50.2 82% 156 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 292GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 126 125 126 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 128 Write 125 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 126 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 276GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 68 72 72 67 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	32% Below average	Read 41.5 Write 47.7 Mixed 32 SusWrite 69.7 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 37%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$33 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 59.8 Write 60 Mixed 47.3 42% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 392GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 41 42 36 37 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 50.5 Write 58 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 39.2 34% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	86% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 35.9 MC Mixed 27.7 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 24.3 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	40	10	60	19"	1440 829	ACR000C X193W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,336x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	686x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	358x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	1,311x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $234Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	535x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	326x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	999x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	209x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	185x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	236x
DDR4 3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 4,421 samples	177x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	177x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $348

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16