Today's hottest deals

Asrock B760M-C R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsrock B760M-C R2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B760M-C R2.0
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 06:42
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$285
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 213
2-Core 423
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 796
8-Core 1,169
123% 982 Pts
64-Core 1,757
109% 1,757 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$380
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 198
Parallax 242
172% 217 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 171
Splatting 127
154% 199 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 153%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M450 2TB
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 632
Write 10.2
Mixed 42.9
48% 228 MB/s
4K Read 89.7
4K Write 296
4K Mixed 92.5
411% 159 MB/s
DQ Read 1,950
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 1,224
863% 1,141 MB/s
Poor: 193% Great: 351%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 162
Write 150
Mixed 68.2
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1
162% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 34.4
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 54 144 24" 1280 720 GSM5BA7 24GN50W
Typical B760M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

System: Asrock B760M-C R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $457
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback