Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 14:17
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 793
79% 641 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 145
Parallax 212
103% 161 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 143
Splatting 95.9
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MV120GB 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0909A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 384 396 400 397 397 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.1% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 390
Mixed 394
SusWrite 392
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 29.5
144% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 41.7
82% 161 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 9.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 11.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 18.5" 1366 705 SAM0632 SMB1930N
Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback