Samsung 600B4C/600B5C

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 600B4C/600B5C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20121005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	78%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 53.3 1-Core 45 2-Core 19.6 30% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 23.8 8-Core 120 7% 72.1 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0E3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.31% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 2.3 2% 2.63 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.31% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MV120GB 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0909A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 174 239 249 202 121 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.7% Average	Read 308 Write 256 Mixed 290 SusWrite 200 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 14.3 58% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 38.3 66% 126 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 97%
Mass Storage Device 240GB 417 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 67GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 31 36 37 32 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 35.7 Write 36 Mixed 35.1 SusWrite 32.2 48% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 4.4 326% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1x8GB 3,554 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 7.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	19	6	60	14"	1280 720	SEC3449

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 600B4C/600B5C Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 600B4C/600B5C

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	16x
Core i7-3840QMIntel $549Bench 66%, 3,981 samples	4x
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	14x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow KC400 256GBKingston $48Bench 85%, 2,939 samples	11x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 4,607 samples	2x

RAM
9905428-155.A00LF 99U5428-078.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 51%, 13 samples	7x
M471B5773CHS-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 41%, 443 samples	2x
M471B5773CHS-CK0 Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF 10GBSamsungBench 37%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369