QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 287%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 376%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics307% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 04:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 232
2-Core 284
116% 203 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,118
97% 831 Pts
64-Core 3,264
202% 3,264 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$958
Asus(1043 88BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Lighting 468
Reflection 435
Parallax 462
382% 455 fps
MRender 559
Gravity 371
Splatting 267
311% 399 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 307%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 512GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1638 1685 1745 1857 1795 1781 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 397 401 411 410 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 442
Write 368
Mixed 350
SusWrite 405
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 25.4
102% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 47.3
86% 166 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 41.2
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 37.2
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 120%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 218 60 164 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback