QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics308% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 06:54
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 228
2-Core 446
133% 255 Pts
4-Core 698
8-Core 1,377
123% 1,038 Pts
64-Core 2,954
183% 2,954 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$958
Asus(1043 88BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Lighting 470
Reflection 411
Parallax 465
383% 449 fps
MRender 561
Gravity 372
Splatting 268
312% 400 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 308%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,962
Write 1,436
Mixed 1,155
336% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 48.7
148% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 699
539% 730 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 423
Write 344
Mixed 323
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 24.6
97% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 50.9
92% 177 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 40.3
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 37.3
112% 39.2 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 119%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 30 199 21 164 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback