Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '19 at 17:10
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Vega Graphics 26 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 203 65% 121 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 278 38% 283 Pts	64-Core 289 18% 289 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 512GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 78 65 52 45 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 301 Write 216 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 67 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 11.4 52% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 98 87% 132 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.9% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 23.2 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16