QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.6 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 18:18
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 161
2-Core 321
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 1,032
101% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,218
75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 214
Parallax 225
192% 225 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 159
Splatting 130
142% 181 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 160%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,150
Write 4,592
Mixed 5,652
1,286% 5,798 MB/s
4K Read 158
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 133
476% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 464
356% 486 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 81%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
885GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 85 84 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 332
Write 98
Mixed 130
SusWrite 84.4
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 12.4
49% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 97.9
84% 128 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 84%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
105GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 7054
Write 4,492
Mixed 5,329
1,246% 5,625 MB/s
4K Read 159
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 130
473% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 489
375% 510 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 33%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
496GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 29.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 38.4
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 35.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 34.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 91%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback