Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M-C  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 21:58
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 264
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 800
80% 649 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 172
Parallax 344
132% 226 fps
MRender 288
Gravity 180
Splatting 240
193% 236 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$55
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 56 57 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,404
Write 904
Mixed 873
SusWrite 119
183% 825 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 72.2
258% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 840
DQ Mixed 343
332% 505 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 169%
Great: 209%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
886GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1312 1332 1331 1355 1354 1344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1,368
Mixed 1,244
SusWrite 1338
302% 1,337 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 82.9
295% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,462
DQ Write 1189
DQ Mixed 1,266
964% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 287%
Great: 623%
WD My Passport 2628 2TB
2TB free, PID 2628
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 71.1
Write 111
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 117
130% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.7
322% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 8.7
DQ Mixed 0.5
314% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 38.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 27" 1280 1360 RTK01BF DP
Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback