Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 02:12
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 73.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 264
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 722
75% 602 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 163
Parallax 314
127% 211 fps
MRender 286
Gravity 171
Splatting 232
187% 229 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 138%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$55
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 55 104 56 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,375
Write 926
Mixed 835
SusWrite 114
180% 812 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 60.5
206% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 112
133% 234 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 139%
Great: 209%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
550% Outstanding
Read 6,978
Write 57.5
Mixed 116
SusWrite 55.8
374% 1,802 MB/s
4K Read 660
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 6.9
1,010% 223 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 550%
Great: 623%
WD My Passport 2628 2TB
2TB free, PID 2628
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 117 119 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 124
Write 113
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 118
143% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.8
298% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.3% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 27.1
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 25.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 1280 720 RTK01BF DP
Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback