Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 17:10
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 135
2-Core 272
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 748
76% 617 Pts
64-Core 910
56% 910 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 170
Parallax 324
132% 218 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 178
Splatting 242
196% 240 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 143%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$55
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 91 57 93 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,353
Write 924
Mixed 874
SusWrite 110
181% 815 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 72.2
254% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 344
328% 498 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 165%
Great: 209%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
793GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1281 1333 1321 1335 1344 1345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1,371
Mixed 1,246
SusWrite 1,327
301% 1,336 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 78.5
289% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,410
DQ Write 1,088
DQ Mixed 1,255
937% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 281%
Great: 623%
WD My Passport 2628 2TB
2TB free, PID 2628
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 117 116 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 127
Write 107
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 117
142% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 27.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 27" 1280 720 RTK01BF DP
Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback