Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 260
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 782
80% 645 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 192
Parallax 340
138% 234 fps
MRender 282
Gravity 184
Splatting 247
195% 238 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$55
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 420 75 89 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 929
Mixed 861
SusWrite 186
185% 834 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 62.1
209% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 342
310% 459 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 154%
Great: 209%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
230GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 56 54 54 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
523% Outstanding
Read 5,682
Write 58.5
Mixed 117
SusWrite 54
307% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 722
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 7.2
1,105% 244 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 523%
Great: 623%
WD My Passport 2628 2TB
2TB free, PID 2628
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 119 118 119 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 95.4
Write 113
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 118
138% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.6
295% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 26
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 27" 1280 720 RTK01BF DP
Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback