Lenovo 82S9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82S9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 15:14
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 66.9
1-Core 185
2-Core 364
106% 205 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,033
97% 807 Pts
64-Core 1,467
91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AF6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 19.6
14% 20.3 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 7.6
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SKHynix_HFS512GDE9X081N 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41730C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1396 848 832 833 830 832 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2785
Write 2,438
Mixed 1763
SusWrite 928
442% 1,979 MB/s
4K Read 78.4
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 116
399% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,691
DQ Write 1,440
DQ Mixed 1577
1,178% 1,569 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 361%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43BB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9059
Typical 82S9 Builds (Compare 1,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82S9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback