Toshiba Satellite L655

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba Satellite L655 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '23 at 02:30
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 57.7 1-Core 64.1 2-Core 75.9 42% 65.9 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 110 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD12) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4304RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 140 113 118 106 69 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.7% Poor	Read 201 Write 203 Mixed 117 SusWrite 123 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 5.9 33% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 46.5 DQ Write 66.2 DQ Mixed 34 32% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 56%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 24GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 64 62 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 57.6 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 61.9 39% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273BH1-CF8 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.2% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	43	34	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO22EC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite L655 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L655

CPU
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	52x
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	29x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	28x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	70x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	65x
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	44x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	13x
TSB1066D3S7ELF/2G 2x2GBUnknownBench 23%, 243 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16