Toshiba Satellite L655

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba Satellite L655 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '23 at 00:09
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 32 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 51.5 26% 41.8 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 119 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 77.8 5% 77.8 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD12) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.39% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.39% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4304RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 130 102 100 109 68 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.6% Poor	Read 109 Write 131 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 114 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 9 38% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 56.1 DQ Mixed 18.5 31% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 56%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 24GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 62 64 62 63 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 63 Write 56.8 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 62.7 40% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273BH1-CF8 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.13% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.3 9% 3.17 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 242 17% 242 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 9.13% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	26	75	27"	1280 720	AOC2702 27B2G5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite L655 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L655

CPU
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	52x
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	29x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	28x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	70x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	65x
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	44x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	13x
TSB1066D3S7ELF/2G 2x2GBUnknownBench 23%, 243 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359