Toshiba Satellite L655

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite L655  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 10:44
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 106
44% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 144
17% 131 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Toshiba(1179 FD12) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.9
1% 2 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 140 134 126 138 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.7% Below average
Read 216
Write 196
Mixed 155
SusWrite 138
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 9.2
45% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 89.2
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 34.6
36% 61 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
24GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 63 62 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 53.2
Write 59.9
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 63.2
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273BH1-CF8 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO22EC
Typical Satellite L655 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L655

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback