Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive20.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion H77H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H77H2-EM
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 11:29
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 56
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 87.2
39% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 174
20% 158 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 75 4.1 9.3 3.5 22 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.1% Poor
Read 179
Write 147
Mixed 131
SusWrite 36.5
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 6
21% 6.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 46.1
48% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
833GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 82 93 94 100 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 92.6
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 91.9
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 112%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 76 77 80 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 104
Write 89.7
Mixed 64
SusWrite 73.3
108% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 2620 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 90 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 110
Write 87.4
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 89.7
112% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 64%
SAMSUNG HD103UI 1TB
815GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 73 73 78 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 41.8
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 70.9
76% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KSF51264AZ-1G6K1 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 16KSF51264AZ-1G6K1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 18 12 64 0" 1280 720
Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Medion H77H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback