Asrock B85M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 14:05
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 278
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 90
Reflection 145
Parallax 171
73% 135 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 92.2
Splatting 159
124% 152 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 319 259 249 227 223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 369
Write 361
Mixed 290
SusWrite 270
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 32.8
119% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 293
238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84%
Great: 133%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
57GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 67 73 74 89 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 155
Write 192
Mixed 158
SusWrite 89.1
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 15.3
75% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 34.7
63% 123 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 78%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
63GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 150 12 44 56 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 321
Write 298
Mixed 130
SusWrite 84.7
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 6.9
46% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 34.4
44% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1302 1600 CL9 Series 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3201 32G1WG4
Typical B85M Pro3 Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback