Asrock B85M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 295
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Lighting 89.1
Reflection 143
Parallax 170
73% 134 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 91.9
Splatting 157
123% 151 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 364 372 347 330 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 426
Mixed 384
SusWrite 350
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 56.3
182% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
38GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 67 74 75 70 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.1% Average
Read 174
Write 207
Mixed 193
SusWrite 86.2
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 19.4
91% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 10.4
47% 105 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 78%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
68GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 129 70 23 19 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 390
Write 347
Mixed 178
SusWrite 90.3
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 14.3
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 34.3
40% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1302 1600 CL9 Series 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 31.5" 1280 720 VSCE635 VX3276-QHD
Typical B85M Pro3 Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback