Asrock B85M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 20:27
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 162
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 269
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 91.7
Reflection 148
Parallax 176
75% 138 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 93.7
Splatting 162
126% 154 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 376 374 416 376 334 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 383
Write 388
Mixed 347
SusWrite 366
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 46.6
156% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
44GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 73 70 67 73 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 165
Write 82.7
Mixed 124
SusWrite 72.5
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 14.6
67% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 36
60% 115 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 78%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
101GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 146 136 97 93 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 350
Write 317
Mixed 130
SusWrite 134
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 9.3
51% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 23.5
38% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1302 1600 CL9 Series 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 75 31.5" 1280 720 VSCE635 VX3276-QHD
Typical B85M Pro3 Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback