Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 10:45
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 152
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 234
29% 223 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.9
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M10C 512GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 199 105 11 7.1 7.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 454
Write 410
Mixed 380
SusWrite 93.8
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 25.4
115% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 0.6
71% 167 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 101%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
559GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 415 420 427 432 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 451
Mixed 420
SusWrite 423
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 52.9
172% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GSA8G4SCL196P-26 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (81st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.2% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 11.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 12 60 20.1" 1280 720 DWL0003 TFT 22WIDE-A
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback