Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 117
49% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 208
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 6.3
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 0
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M10C 512GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 35 86 42 98 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 329
Write 281
Mixed 290
SusWrite 116
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 6.7
18% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PJ16TFK1GM8 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 12.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback