Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7267U 583 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 196 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 288 38% 288 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 1,818 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7986 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.1% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 4.8 Parallax 6.2 4% 5.5 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 5.8 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.1% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M10C 512GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 453GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0929A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 391 395 395 394 401 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 392 Mixed 377 SusWrite 394 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 32.6 156% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 42.8 93% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GSA8G4SCL196P-26 1x8GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	485x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	464x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,373x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	494x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87