Casper NIRVANA ONE PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Casper NIRVANA ONE PC (all builds)
Motherboard	INTEL MAHOBAY
Memory	3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130307
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '23 at 17:30
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 132 58% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 202 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1991 5584) 1GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 0.6 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3 Splatting 2.2 2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 100 104 96 102 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 85 67% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 69%
ST1000LM 014-1EJ164 1TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 58.6 Write 21.8 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 26.2 39% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.2 86% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 98.5 41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	9	60	14.5"	1280 720	NVD0800 Nvidia Default Flat Panel

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NIRVANA ONE PC Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA ONE PC

CPU
Core i5-3470SIntelBench 65%, 14,631 samples	7x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	3x
Pentium G640Intel $30Bench 48%, 3,040 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	14x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x
240GB SATA 240GBSSDBench 74%, 43 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	3x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 25%, 3,468 samples	2x
99U5428-040.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 640 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $51

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16