TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 44% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100927
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateDec 23 '16 at 07:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU 53%
CPU Throttled 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 47.5
30% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 61.8
8-Core 67.3
8% 64.6 Pts
64-Core 69.6
4% 69.6 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 33.5%
 Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Sanyo(144D C07F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4OC66G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 51.7
Mixed 53.8
41% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.17
50% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 31.1%
 Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 21%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852

CPU
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples39x
Core i3 M 370Intel  $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples36x
Core i3 M 380Intel  $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples34x
GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples114x
Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples41x
Mobility Radeon HD 545vATIBench 1%, 267 samples4x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples10x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples6x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples6x
RAM
M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 995 samples30x
M471B5773CHS-CF8 M471B2873FHS-CF8 3GBSamsungBench 21%, 72 samples12x
M471B2873FHS-CF8 M471B5773CHS-CF8 3GBSamsungBench 21%, 109 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback