Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 31.9 1-Core 27.1 2-Core 49.5 22% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 116 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 1.66 2% 2.06 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
ST1000LM 014-1EJ164 1TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 62GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 57 56 78 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 58.2 Write 58.5 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 61.6 77% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 57%
Seagate Desktop 1.5TB 569 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 17GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 37 37 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 38 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 38.7 44% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.1 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	4x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	4x

SSD
Kingsuxing 128GBBench 54%, 24 samples	2x
SSD370 128GBTranscend $74Bench 71%, 4,687 samples	1x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16