Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 10:26
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 852
84% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3526 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 119
Parallax 136
115% 132 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
111% 140 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 138 244 218 296 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 740
Write 630
Mixed 126
SusWrite 204
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 74.4
235% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 563
457% 654 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 147%
Great: 320%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 70 80 59 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 501
Write 478
Mixed 418
SusWrite 80.9
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 41.2
155% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
66GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 72 82 60 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 489
Write 402
Mixed 359
SusWrite 82.5
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 40.8
147% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 170
175% 286 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 116%
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 2TB
90GB free
Firmware: 42B4S9NA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 373 354 366 344 372 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 773
Write 660
Mixed 682
SusWrite 364
139% 620 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 69.2
231% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 524
439% 642 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 156%
Great: 364%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 48.8
MC Mixed 35.9
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 33.7
102% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 170 26.9" 1280 720 GBT270D M27Q
Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback