Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 21:48
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 281
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 864
85% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3537 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 122
Parallax 142
116% 135 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 136
Splatting 112
114% 144 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1161 1245 1246 1224 1219 1211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,371
Write 1,206
Mixed 155
SusWrite 1,218
220% 987 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 79.4
264% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 573
574% 929 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 260%
Great: 320%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 473 471 468 469 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 474
Mixed 408
SusWrite 466
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 52.6
182% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 121%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
66GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 472 468 465 466 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 461
Mixed 348
SusWrite 464
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 42.9
152% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 177
178% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 2TB
90GB free
Firmware: 42B4S9NA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1152 1146 895 849 850 851 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,428
Write 1,190
Mixed 1,130
SusWrite 957
264% 1,176 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 71.4
240% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 957
DQ Mixed 527
554% 920 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 240%
Great: 364%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 35.9
121% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 31.9
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 70: 0P 5R 10G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 10% 94 512 457 170 26.9" 2048 1152 GBT270D M27Q
History: Score 21: 0P 3R 0G 6B | Score 70: 0P 5R 10G 15B
Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback