Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 14:59
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 145
2-Core 273
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 870
86% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 117
Parallax 136
109% 129 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 129
Splatting 108
110% 139 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 957 1023 1082 1268 1121 1212 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,309
Write 1,102
Mixed 122
SusWrite 1,111
203% 911 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 73.5
248% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1223
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 579
572% 919 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 245%
Great: 320%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 460 468 476 479 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 436
Mixed 410
SusWrite 470
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 49
164% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
66GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 459 466 474 477 478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 456
Mixed 340
SusWrite 468
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 37.9
134% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 174
180% 295 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 116%
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 2TB
70GB free
Firmware: 42B4S9NA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1201 1198 878 880 758 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,296
Write 1,130
Mixed 1,066
SusWrite 850
244% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 65.1
225% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 942
DQ Mixed 530
549% 906 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 222%
Great: 364%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 45.6
MC Mixed 34.5
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 46.3
SC Mixed 31
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 170 26.9" 2048 1152 GBT270D M27Q
Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback