Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 14:25
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 224
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 748
70% 584 Pts
64-Core 997
62% 997 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 112
Parallax 130
105% 124 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 126
Splatting 105
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 507 661 1276 1112 1108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,348
Write 1,167
Mixed 123
SusWrite 839
193% 869 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 76.6
255% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 573
530% 819 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 226%
Great: 320%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 447 457 479 475 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 404
Mixed 389
SusWrite 464
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 49
163% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
66GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 446 457 478 474 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 380
Mixed 350
SusWrite 463
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 39.9
140% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 177
182% 296 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S11 P 2TB
70GB free
Firmware: 42B4S9NA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1218 1103 775 801 338 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 1,057
Mixed 1,072
SusWrite 752
238% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 68.7
236% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,098
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 533
518% 825 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 217%
Great: 364%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 35.1
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 3R 3G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 25% 77 217 60 170 26.9" 2048 1089 GBT270D M27Q
Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback