Dell XPS 8950

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive537% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell XPS 8950  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R6PCT
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 05:06
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 202
2-Core 393
117% 225 Pts
4-Core 783
8-Core 1,502
136% 1,142 Pts
64-Core 2,240
139% 2,240 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 195
Reflection 162
Parallax 200
159% 186 fps
MRender 262
Gravity 140
Splatting 104
130% 169 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 139%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SHPP41-1000GM 1TB
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51060A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3730 3737 3707 3665 1398 1403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
537% Outstanding
Read 4,485
Write 3744
Mixed 2,631
SusWrite 2,940
772% 3,450 MB/s
4K Read 74.7
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 114
372% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,600
DQ Write 1207
DQ Mixed 1,341
1,020% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 537%
Great: 572%
SSD 1TB PRO 1TB
951GB free
Firmware: 2202T1MK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 396 395 395 395 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 399
Mixed 367
SusWrite 395
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53.6
182% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 274
224% 320 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 120%
SSD 1TB PRO 1TB
294GB free
Firmware: 2202T1MK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 395 396 396 395 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 396
Mixed 372
SusWrite 396
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.1
179% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 273
223% 319 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4672 4677 3109 1728 1746 1732 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
531% Outstanding
Read 3,281
Write 4,788
Mixed 3,257
SusWrite 2944
807% 3,567 MB/s
4K Read 97.4
4K Write 270
4K Mixed 147
479% 172 MB/s
DQ Read 1,688
DQ Write 1,449
DQ Mixed 1,580
1,181% 1,572 MB/s
Poor: 347%
This bench: 531%
Great: 531%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M323R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
140% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 51.1
MC Mixed 49.9
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 29.8
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 140%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24C3 ASUS VG246
Typical XPS 8950 Builds (Compare 3,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

System: Dell XPS 8950

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback