Dell XPS 8940

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell XPS 8940  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0427JK
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 06:37
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 301
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,037
94% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Dell(1028 C976) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 167
Parallax 180
146% 175 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
633GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1124 1993 2260 2377 2305 2005 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,558
Write 2226
Mixed 2,135
SusWrite 2,011
502% 2,232 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 79.1
258% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1101
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 929
699% 941 MB/s
Poor: 347%
This bench: 347%
Great: 531%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
576GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1806 2172 2175 2175 1998 1473 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,268
Write 2,186
Mixed 2,086
SusWrite 1,967
479% 2,127 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 83.4
269% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,333
DQ Write 909
DQ Mixed 1,082
818% 1,108 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 345%
Great: 438%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
1TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 468 471 456 475 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 471
Mixed 452
SusWrite 468
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 56.8
183% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 339
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 292 293 281 293 292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 463
Mixed 405
SusWrite 310
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 54.3
180% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 337
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO2P32NC8W1-BD3SHC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 20.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 1R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 21% 61 442 277 60 27" 1920 1080 DELA197 DELL S2721QS
History: Score 12: 0P 0R 2G 6B | Score 23: 0P 1R 3G 9B
Typical XPS 8940 Builds (Compare 10,242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO

System: Dell XPS 8940

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $540
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback