Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509DA
Memory	7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211008
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '23 at 11:53
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U 21,522 User benchmarks, average bench 41% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Memory 33.7 1-Core 46 2-Core 74.2 30% 51.3 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 176 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 Graphics 15 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 14BF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.10.1 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	4.04% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 7.7 Parallax 5.2 4% 5.83 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 7.7 5% 5.33 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.04% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7000Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 110 132 115 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 756 Write 131 Mixed 162 SusWrite 111 62% 290 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 23.3 80% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 150 118% 167 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 169%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 11.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	2	60	15.5"	1280 720	BOE07AA

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	61x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	38x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	26x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	61x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	38x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	26x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	48x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	18x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	14x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	35x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	18x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16