Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509DA
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 15:43
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 120
49% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 184
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 Graphics
Asus(1043 14BF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.1.1
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 4.7
3% 5 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 8.5
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 123 126 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 811
Write 181
Mixed 222
SusWrite 131
73% 336 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 28.6
108% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 173
135% 188 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.5% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback