Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509DA
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 15:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41% Average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 94.5
49% 79 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 188
20% 162 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 Graphics
Asus(1043 14BF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.1.1
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 8.8
3% 6.4 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 8.2
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 189 143 135 129 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 861
Write 133
Mixed 205
SusWrite 160
74% 340 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 17.1
92% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 231
184% 256 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 22.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.6
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback