Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509DA
Memory	6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211008
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '23 at 14:43
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U 21,522 User benchmarks, average bench 41% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 133 48% 85.2 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 188 25% 187 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 Graphics 15 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 14BF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.1.1 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 7.9 Parallax 1.6 3% 4.37 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 8.9 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7000Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 127 129 125 124 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 730 Write 147 Mixed 220 SusWrite 129 67% 306 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 27.2 97% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 139 116% 171 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 169%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 20.1 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 11.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	62x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	38x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	27x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	62x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	38x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	27x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $58Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	48x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	18x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	14x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	35x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	18x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $58

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369