Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 14:07
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 95
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 321
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 6.5
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 8
Splatting 11.2
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GD3JX016N 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1462 675 415 425 421 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 2,060
Write 1,740
Mixed 1,061
SusWrite 637
306% 1,375 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 39.8
117% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 588
450% 616 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 186%
Great: 287%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 Adata 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 DEL422F DELL U2722D
Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $691
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback