Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 22:35
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 62.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 899
80% 676 Pts
64-Core 2313
143% 2313 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 254
Parallax 510
188% 331 fps
MRender 390
Gravity 210
Splatting 333
255% 311 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 189%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1382 1190 1196 1194 1180 942 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,032
Write 1,782
Mixed 846
SusWrite 1,181
326% 1,460 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.3
202% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 689
524% 710 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 247%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
247GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1837 1674 1686 1687 1683 1444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,591
Write 2,319
Mixed 1,949
SusWrite 1,668
478% 2,132 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 82.6
279% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 946
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 803
611% 828 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 330%
Great: 410%
G-drive USB-C 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 206 199 201 201 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 202
Mixed 132
SusWrite 202
137% 187 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
290% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 119%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$167
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 57.3
MC Mixed 50.6
153% 53.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 21.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 134%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM774B 34GN850
Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback