Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 60
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 903
80% 676 Pts
64-Core 2,294
142% 2,294 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 233
Reflection 256
Parallax 508
190% 332 fps
MRender 384
Gravity 208
Splatting 328
252% 307 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 189%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1374 1192 1192 1186 1153 810 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,973
Write 1,739
Mixed 756
SusWrite 1,151
314% 1,405 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 57.7
191% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 689
524% 710 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 241%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
247GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1829 1665 1695 1685 1692 1357 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,589
Write 2,181
Mixed 1,893
SusWrite 1,654
466% 2,079 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 82.1
275% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 806
613% 831 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 328%
Great: 410%
G-drive USB-C 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 206 199 201 200 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 219
Mixed 128
SusWrite 201
138% 187 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
328% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$167
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 50.4
153% 53.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 21
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 133%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 13% 38 209 57 144 34.1" 3440 1440 GSM774B 34GN850
Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback