Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 22:22
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
73% 136 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 904
80% 678 Pts
64-Core 2,292
142% 2,292 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 261
Parallax 517
189% 337 fps
MRender 391
Gravity 215
Splatting 332
256% 312 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 190%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1384 1200 1148 1043 1044 744 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,968
Write 1,748
Mixed 791
SusWrite 1,094
313% 1,400 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.6
190% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 690
525% 713 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 237%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
247GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1838 1667 1686 1689 1624 1235 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 1,979
Mixed 1,916
SusWrite 1,623
454% 2,028 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 80.9
276% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 732
DQ Mixed 793
605% 821 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 326%
Great: 410%
G-drive USB-C 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 204 200 201 200 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 201
Mixed 129
SusWrite 201
136% 184 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
318% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 117%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 58.3
MC Mixed 51
155% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 135%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM774B 34GN850
Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback