Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 22:15
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 904
80% 679 Pts
64-Core 2,315
143% 2,315 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 257
Parallax 510
192% 334 fps
MRender 385
Gravity 210
Splatting 328
252% 308 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 190%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 1188 1174 1172 736 494 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,023
Write 1,753
Mixed 802
SusWrite 1,024
312% 1,401 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 58.1
193% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 687
523% 709 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 236%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
247GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1840 1675 1690 1516 1293 996 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,567
Write 2,214
Mixed 1,917
SusWrite 1,502
460% 2,050 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 82.7
276% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 807
614% 832 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 318%
Great: 410%
G-drive USB-C 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 205 198 202 201 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 219
Mixed 132
SusWrite 201
140% 190 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
300% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$129
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 56.1
MC Mixed 50.6
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 20.6
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 132%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM774B 34GN850
Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback