Gigabyte GA-PA65-UD3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-PA65-UD3-B3  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '17 at 09:07
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$200
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 465
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 65.2
52% 65 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 53.2
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30% Poor
Read 328
Write 87.8
Mixed 18.2
31% 145 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 3.64
38% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 3.43
6% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
902GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 108
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.44
108% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-PA65-UD3-B3 Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-PA65-UD3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback