Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '17 at 02:17
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 94.6 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 161 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 492 49% 400 Pts	64-Core 614 38% 614 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E2) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	109% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 168 Parallax 188 112% 164 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 167 Splatting 119 111% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ INTR EPID 3700 960GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 327GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3845 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1078 (64) Unknown 100 100 14326848 (AB) Unknown 83 0 11357 (AE) Unknown 22 100 247 (B8) Unknown 16 100 2211 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 41 63 4135209 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 14726 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 16679 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 3377518447 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 100 100 10000 (CE) Flying height 0 100 0 (CF) Spin high current 17 100 527 (D0) Spin buzz 1 100 52 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (D3) Unknown 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 83 (D5) Unknown 100 100 42 (D6) Unknown 100 100 41 (DD) G-sense error rate 100 100 2384 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 1 100 1 (E9) Unknown 100 0 100 (F9) Unknown 100 100 33155 (FB) Unknown 100 100 39900	52.4% Above average	Read 311 Write 228 Mixed 261 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 44 4K Mixed 18 73% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 47.5 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 6.26 28% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 67%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 8395 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2678 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3377 (0A) Spinup retry count 153 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 721 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 979 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 259 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2686 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159151139 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1726 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 557 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: 04.05G11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 253 227 9083 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2327 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31764 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 791 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 319 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2007 (C2) HDA temperature 119 109 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 99.3 Write 99.9 Mixed 96.8 74% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.34 123% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 677GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 168 2308 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5788 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10514 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2689 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 550 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5239 (C2) HDA temperature 115 89 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	99.3% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 169 Mixed 151 124% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.22 106% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.8% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 11.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 12 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 58.1 69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	607x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	294x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	311x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	188x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16