Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 223% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 214% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190723
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '21 at 08:59
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$263 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 98 1-Core 155 2-Core 309 103% 187 Pts	4-Core 620 8-Core 1,212 108% 916 Pts	64-Core 1211 75% 1211 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	215% Outstanding	Lighting 320 Reflection 294 Parallax 358 261% 324 fps	MRender 352 Gravity 259 Splatting 184 208% 265 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_5210_MTFDDAK1T9QDE 2TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: D2MU001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 253 245 246 249 245 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 417 Write 252 Mixed 254 SusWrite 248 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 19.3 60% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 59.2 76% 138 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 82%
OCZ INTR EPID 3700 960GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 336GB free Firmware: 8201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 387 388 389 388 390 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.9% Good	Read 361 Write 331 Mixed 248 SusWrite 388 75% 332 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 21.5 71% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 62.9 70% 120 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 67%
Hgst HUS726T6TALE6L4 6TB 792 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4.5TB free Firmware: VKGNW40H SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 204 198 202 202 200 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 172 Write 176 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 201 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.9 7% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 28%
Hitachi HUH728060ALE604 6TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 859GB free Firmware: A4GNW7J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 128 123 125 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 114 Write 117 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 126 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 108%
WD WD4500HLHX-01JJPV0 450GB 847 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 419GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 137 136 132 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	79% Very good	Read 140 Write 131 Mixed 86 SusWrite 135 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 81%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 157 159 158 159 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 112 Write 101 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 157 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 100%
Apple HDD HTS545050A7E362 500GB 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 71GB free Firmware: GG2AB990 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 62 61 56 63 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 58.5 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 58.8 35% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 61%
Toshiba MG06ACA800E 8TB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 233 232 236 232 231 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 204 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 232 133% 182 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 132%
HGST Ultrastar He8 Helium 8TB-$100 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1TB free Firmware: A4GNW7J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 113 117 116 121 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 117 Write 120 Mixed 65 SusWrite 118 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 113%
HGST HUH 721010ALE604 10TB 5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 183 191 179 188 178 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.1% Excellent	Read 189 Write 184 Mixed 112 SusWrite 183 224% 167 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.1 227% 2.97 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB 613 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 33.4 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 31 91% 31.9 GB/s	Latency 46.2 87% 46.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 153%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 152%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	162x
Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	73x
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	29x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	25x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $39Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	14x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 5,888 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	14x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,009

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16